FairPoint, Maine CLEC caught in billing spat

FairPoint is fighting another battle in Maine against competitive provider Great Works Internet (GWI) of Biddeford, which claims that the troubled ILEC owes it about $2 million.

Great Works has asked Maine's Public Utilities Commission to investigate FairPoint's business processes.   

The debate between the two companies has become a case of he said/she said because FairPoint claims that GWI actually owes them $2 million to buy wholesale capacity on their telephone lines. Adding to the complexity of the feud, which dates back to 2005 when Verizon owned the lines, FairPoint said that Bankruptcy Court not the PUC has the right to rule on GWI's claims.

"The bottom line is they disagree with us. And we disagree with them," Nevins said. "We feel we have legal standing."

GWI claims that FairPoint was overcharging it for the lines it uses to connect business customers. However, FairPoint says GWI is refusing to pay market rate prices that FairPoint can set for the lines. A previous court decision apparently gave FairPoint the right to charge market rates versus those set by the PUC.

This is not the only time that FairPoint has found itself defending its wholesale service practices in Maine. In July, the Maine PUC slapped FairPoint with a $400,000 fine for providing poor service to competitive carriers.

For more:
- CED via Associated Press has this article

Related articles
FairPoint Communications - Top Telecom Turkeys of 2009
FairPoint faces more troubles in Maine
FairPoint files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
FairPoint plots financial restructuring plan
Frontier's Verizon acquisition facing CWA union wrath

Suggested Articles

Telco Systems announced that it has achieved a performance milestone in the development of a full Open vSwitch data path hardware offload solution.

GBI is using Nuage Networks' SD-WAN technologies to connect branch locations to both public and private clouds in the Middle East and Africa.

For the first time, Huawei has put some numbers behind the impact that the U.S. ban is having on its bottom line.